DanArmak comments on Let them eat cake: Interpersonal Problems vs Tasks - Less Wrong

70 Post author: HughRistik 07 October 2009 04:35PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (568)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DanArmak 08 October 2009 08:56:27PM 0 points [-]

People who argue that a wife owes obedience to her husband. And incidentally sex.

Comment author: Alicorn 08 October 2009 08:57:20PM 0 points [-]

Using a sex example would kind of ruin the point of having an analogy at all.

Comment author: DanArmak 08 October 2009 09:07:56PM 4 points [-]

You're right. How about: people who claim I owe three years' servitude at risk of life and limb, in the service of "my country".

(Actually, that should be "owed", because they did get what they wanted. But that distracts from the analogy.)

Comment author: Alicorn 08 October 2009 09:12:14PM 0 points [-]

That might be analogous, but I have never lived in any location that drafts women and I have an unusually strong negative reaction to the idea of military service in general, and so I can't know for sure.

Comment author: DanArmak 08 October 2009 09:14:42PM 5 points [-]

I have never lived in any location that drafts women

Israel does, although it's possible for women to get out of it if they really try.

I have an unusually strong negative reaction to the idea of military service in general

Then the analogy serves it's purpose, doesn't it?

Comment author: Alicorn 08 October 2009 09:29:37PM 3 points [-]

Not precisely. I don't have an intense negative reaction to the idea of sex in general, after all.

Comment author: DanArmak 08 October 2009 09:39:06PM 2 points [-]

Military service is generally understood to be coercive, so you're right to have a negative reaction to it (and so do I). Volunteer-only armies are extremely rare exceptions - far more rare than rape is compared to sex.

Comment author: komponisto 10 October 2009 04:35:41AM 0 points [-]

Military service is generally understood to be coercive

Really? I suspect a lot of young Americans would view the idea of coerced military service as another one of those bizarre practices from the distant past.

Comment author: gwern 10 October 2009 05:04:55AM 2 points [-]

Which only goes to show that they don't read their own history books about drafts, or newspapers about stop-loss policies and the National Guard deployments.

Comment author: komponisto 10 October 2009 05:54:36AM 0 points [-]

Some may not read history, but it doesn't follow from what I said. They may know very well that the draft existed in the past.

(I've noticed that a lot of people old enough to remember e.g. Vietnam have trouble accepting that we're in a different historical era now; they often speak in a way that suggests they think the draft could easily be brought back, when in fact the political reality is such that that's extremely unlikely.)

National Guard service is voluntary, and stop-loss concerns people already signed up.

Comment author: Cyan 10 October 2009 05:17:03AM 1 point [-]
Comment author: komponisto 10 October 2009 06:03:30AM 1 point [-]

I realize that. In fact I was specifically calling attention to the difference in perspectives.