thomblake comments on Let them eat cake: Interpersonal Problems vs Tasks - Less Wrong

70 Post author: HughRistik 07 October 2009 04:35PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (568)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: thomblake 16 April 2010 12:47:28PM 3 points [-]

This is amongst the reasons I won't send my kids to school, and try to discourage anyone else from doing so.

Comment author: wedrifid 17 April 2010 04:33:45PM 1 point [-]

I will have a similar policy if and when I happen to breed. As Jowibou alludes to, this means I will have to take the initiative in seeking high quality social interactions for my children myself. It may be a better option for my children but it certainly will not be easier!

(Care to share your thoughts on the subject?)

Comment author: thomblake 20 April 2010 02:52:32PM 1 point [-]

I know several people who were unschooled. Their parents didn't particularly 'take the initiative' in the sense of organizing 'play-dates' or other such things; but the parents did make the children a part of their lives, so the children interacted with ordinary people practically every day.

Comment author: wedrifid 21 April 2010 12:34:28AM 1 point [-]

In your judgement how well did that work for them?

Comment author: thomblake 22 April 2010 02:58:46PM 3 points [-]

Well as far as I can tell, they're all some of the most brilliant people I've met, and not socially stunted or anything. And seeing the lack of scars from schooling on these folks really makes them obvious on everyone else.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 22 April 2010 04:52:35PM 5 points [-]

Could you expand on the "scars from schooling"?

Comment author: gregconen 22 April 2010 03:09:12PM 4 points [-]

Keep in mind selection bias. The pool of people who would unschool their children is systematically different from the general population. Aspects of child-rearing unrelated to schooling (at least conventional schooling) and/or genetics probably played a role in determining the adult personality of their children.

Comment author: thomblake 22 April 2010 03:49:24PM 5 points [-]

Indeed. The eldest of them hypothesizes that it wasn't so much unschooling that caused the good effects, but more likely other factors, most relevantly "the parents having bothered to make any decision regarding their children's schooling", which has been shown to matter in other contexts.

Comment author: Jowibou 17 April 2010 10:07:41AM 1 point [-]

Have you found ways for them to nevertheless socialize with their peers?

Comment author: thomblake 20 April 2010 02:49:12PM 7 points [-]

Socializing with their peers isn't nearly as important as socializing with ordinary folks in society. Schools artificially stick a bunch of kids of the same age group together with one 'authority figure'; naturally, they learn to socialize from other kids and form 'kid culture' and act like a bunch of monkeys.

Rather than go to school and learn how to be kids, it's much better to let kids meet the neighbors and learn how to be people. Your neighbors may vary.