Douglas_Knight comments on Is cryonics necessary?: Writing yourself into the future - Less Wrong

6 Post author: gworley 23 June 2010 02:33PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (137)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 23 June 2010 06:44:25PM 7 points [-]

(Words we write down are only very loosely correlated with who we are.)

No, it says something about you that you made that joke and Morendil made the other. (this is also a response to nickernst's comment about not knowing himself)

Comment author: Blueberry 23 June 2010 08:17:58PM 0 points [-]

Can you elaborate on what you think it means about them?

Comment author: wedrifid 23 June 2010 09:05:40PM 4 points [-]

Well, for a start, that we're funny guys. ;)

But it also hints at my general cognitive processes. When I encounter a concept I understand it by exploring the extremes, the boundary cases and exceptions (even in my own thoughts). The exploits. That I chose to make a joke rather than a criticism in this context is also fairly indicative of my personality, although the inference there is somewhat more difficult. It would require looking at my social responses to various other situations.

Comment author: Kaj_Sotala 25 June 2010 06:11:36AM *  6 points [-]

Also, using the terms "Elven Jedi" is a pretty clear indicator of you being more affiliated than average with the scifi/fantasy geekdom. Choosing to include "sexual" content such as the size of one's penis also says something - there are lots of people who'd be too prudish to go even that far. Some weak inferences could probably be also drawn from the fact that you used the expression "Dear Diary".

None of this would be enough to justify any firm conclusions by itself, of course. But combined with a large enough number of other weak pieces of evidence...

Comment author: Alicorn 25 June 2010 06:12:36AM 3 points [-]

I will never write an epistolary work of fiction again!

Comment author: gwern 15 October 2010 12:46:34AM *  6 points [-]

I'm sorry, the 'I will never X again!' snowclone just tagged you as a white 21st century American in the top decile of intelligence who has spent a great deal of time reading webcomics in the style of or affiliated to Dinosaur Comics, with all that implies.

Comment author: jimrandomh 15 October 2010 02:38:32AM 1 point [-]

What's wrong with being a white, 21st century American in the upper decile of intelligence who has read Dinosaur Comics?

Comment author: gwern 15 October 2010 02:44:15AM 7 points [-]

Alicorn's disavowal is due to fear of something learning about her through a series of weak inferences; however, ironically, her disavowal/vow to avoid revealing data useful for weak inference is itself grist for the weak inference mill. (And hopefully my example inferences show that the weak inferences may not be all that weak.)

That something learning about her might be entirely neutral. On the other hand, it might be an unFriendly AI programmed by Black Panthers who were picked on as kids by nerds and are irritated by Ryan North's longboard stylings.

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 23 June 2010 08:54:12PM 4 points [-]

No, I cannot, just like nickernst cannot do a core dump. But a lot of information leaks out that might be exploitable by a superintelligence. Cryonics has the advantage of not requiring a superintelligence, probably only nanotech.