bogus comments on How to get that Friendly Singularity: a minority view - Less Wrong

12 Post author: Mitchell_Porter 10 October 2009 10:56AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (69)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: knb 12 October 2009 11:28:06PM 1 point [-]

Personally, I find it hard to see how twenty more years can pass without people being able to make planet-killing nanotechnology, so I give it twenty years maximum before we're in the endgame.

This seems to be an extraordinary claim, but it doesn't seem anyone else has commented on this. Admittedly this is somewhat tangential to the main point, but I wonder if this is the common educated view on the subject.

My own general expectation was that self-replicating nanotechnology would take several decades at the low end and possibly more than a hundred years, in the absence of an AI singularity.

Comment author: bogus 13 October 2009 12:00:50AM *  1 point [-]

Um... last I checked, self-replicating nanotechnology had been here for quite a while. It's called bacteria. Although they haven't managed to kill the planet so far.

Comment author: CronoDAS 16 October 2009 09:29:03PM 4 points [-]
Comment author: DanArmak 17 October 2009 01:09:37AM 1 point [-]

Under the same definition, all life - including us humans - is based on self-replicating nanotechnology. Bacteria are nothing special.