Mitchell_Porter comments on How to get that Friendly Singularity: a minority view - Less Wrong

12 Post author: Mitchell_Porter 10 October 2009 10:56AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (69)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Mitchell_Porter 16 October 2009 02:40:31AM 1 point [-]

I am more optimistic than you are about science achieving the sort of progress I called for, in time to be relevant. For one thing, this is largely about basic concepts. One or two reconceptualizations, as big as what relativity did to time, and the topic of consciousness will look completely different. That conceptual progress is a matter of someone achieving the right insights and communicating them. (Evidently my little essay on quantum monadology isn't the turning point, or my LW karma wouldn't be sinking the way it is...) The interactions between progress in neuroscience, classical computing, quantum computing, and programming are complicated, but when it comes to solving the ontological problem of consciousness in time for the Singularity, I'd say the main factor is the rate of conceptual progress regarding consciousness, and that's internal to the field of consciousness studies.

Comment author: SilasBarta 16 October 2009 03:02:47AM 0 points [-]

Evidently my little essay on quantum monadology isn't the turning point, or my LW karma wouldn't be sinking the way it is...

More engaging, less whining, please.

Comment author: Mitchell_Porter 16 October 2009 03:12:50AM 0 points [-]

Hey, it was a joke.

Comment author: DSimon 23 September 2010 07:54:43PM 1 point [-]

To help readers distinguish between self-deprecating jokes and whining, the Internet has provided us with a palette of emoticons. I recommend ";-)" for this particular scenario.