Johnicholas comments on How to think like a quantum monadologist - Less Wrong

-14 Post author: Mitchell_Porter 15 October 2009 09:37AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (266)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Johnicholas 15 October 2009 02:41:43PM 3 points [-]

I don't know much, but...

Leibniz's monads were an attempt to resolve the mind-body problem. Supposedly, monads are something like atoms, and something like souls. They don't interact with each other - all causality goes from God directly to the monads, not from one monad to the other - for example, perception is only accurate by God arranging for monads' perceptions to be accurate.

It seems like really incredibly strange metaphysics / theology to me.

Comment author: Mitchell_Porter 16 October 2009 01:52:12AM *  1 point [-]

It seems like really incredibly strange metaphysics / theology to me.

I agree. Bertrand Russell explained it as due to Leibniz's beliefs about causality - one substance could not affect another substance. By a monad I just mean an elementary "thing" which can have mental states.