= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
wedrifid comments on How to think like a quantum monadologist - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (266)
No, but give me an imperfect self-replicator and a few billion years and I may well be able to produce a creature that perceives, experiences and describes colour in much the same way that Mitchell Porter does.
Monads, midichlorians and phlogiston just aren't required to explain the phenomena that can be seen in the universe.
which proves exactly nothing about whether or how it is being done physically.
They aren't required to expalin the phenomena that have been explained. As to the phenomena that have not been explained...