whowhowho comments on How to think like a quantum monadologist - Less Wrong

-14 Post author: Mitchell_Porter 15 October 2009 09:37AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (266)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: whowhowho 31 January 2013 06:10:34PM 0 points [-]

No, but give me an imperfect self-replicator and a few billion years and I may well be able to produce a creature that perceives, experiences and describes colour in much the same way that Mitchell Porter does.

which proves exactly nothing about whether or how it is being done physically.

Monads, midichlorians and phlogiston just aren't required to explain the phenomena that can be seen in the universe.

They aren't required to expalin the phenomena that have been explained. As to the phenomena that have not been explained...