= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Emile comments on Applying Double Standards to ‘‘Divisive’’ Ideas - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (5)
It may be "meta" in the sense that it's a paper about a paper about a paper, but a lot of it assumes more familiarity with the papers involved than you'll find here.
"Oh, hey Bob, I just saw a post on Less Wrong about a commentary on a paper about a paper regarding studies on race and intelli..."
universe implodes
And I just read a comment on a post on Less Wrong about...
I've only read a few of the specific papers mentioned, but I have read enough in the area to follow the article easily. And it is meta in its excellent discussion of using double standards to suppress research you don't want to think about.