gwern comments on Shortness is now a treatable condition - Less Wrong

9 Post author: taw 20 October 2009 01:13AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (110)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: cousin_it 21 October 2009 02:21:43PM *  6 points [-]

Except the reasoning on the OkCupid blog is completely worthless because of this little note:

We were careful to preselect our data pool so that physical attractiveness (as measured by our site picture-rating utility) was roughly even across all the race/gender slices. For guys, we did likewise with height.

In other words, they fucking control for physical attractiveness. If men found e.g. Black women more physically attractive en masse, their charts wouldn't reflect that. What actual effect they were measuring, exactly, is a mystery to me at the moment.

Comment author: gwern 21 October 2009 02:51:01PM 3 points [-]

What actual effect they were measuring, exactly, is a mystery to me at the moment.

Perhaps either falsification in beauty rankings ('that black chick isn't too hot, but for a black chick she's pretty good, so I will give her a high rating even though I'd likely ignore her'), or the exact opposite ("she's hot, but I'd rather an equally hot white chick"); oh the irony...

Comment author: cousin_it 21 October 2009 02:52:45PM *  1 point [-]

that black chick isn't too hot, but for a black chick she's pretty good

...Wow, that's another great catch. I really should've thought of that one myself. Kudos.

OkCupid, are you here? Are you listening? =)

Comment author: taw 21 October 2009 04:25:30PM 0 points [-]

People don't just look at pictures when they decide if they're attracted to someone, and correction was only for picture attractiveness.