I'm also interested in whether you'd say that Silas called Zack a liar.

Let's go back a few steps. You said that in your "last few interactions" with me, I called you a liar. You later clarified that you were thinking of this discussion. But I didn't deny calling Zack a liar in that discussion; I denied calling you a liar. So why are you suddenly acting like your original claim was about whether I called Zack a liar?

(In any case, it wasn't just "Zack, you liar". My remark was more like, "this is what you claimed, this is why it's implausible, this is why your comments are hindering the discussion, please stop making this so difficult by coming up with ever-more-convoluted stories.")

Are you and Zack the same person?

Considering that the earlier discussion was about whether you can arbitrarily redefine yourself as a different person, maybe Zack/Douglas are just taking the whole idea a little too seriously! :-P

(And in a show of further irony, that would be just the kind of subtle point that Zack and [?] Douglas, severely overestimating its obviousness, were defending in the thread!)