gwern comments on Pound of Feathers, Pound of Gold - Less Wrong

2 Post author: Annoyance 23 October 2009 05:48PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (15)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gwern 23 October 2009 07:51:29PM 0 points [-]

What is the question that makes sense? 'Does a cubic meter of feathers weigh more than a cubic meter of gold'? A cubic foot?

Comment author: Psychohistorian 24 October 2009 12:12:38AM 2 points [-]

It doesn't make sense because the answer is so obvious, no one is likely to genuinely ask for a comparison between the weight of the two objects. There's a definite "Duh" answer. By contrast, "Which is heavier, lead or mercury?" or "feathers or dry leaves?" would not (in most cases) prime a "duh" answer, so people listen the question more carefully.

I'll admit there's a lot more to it, but I think that our understanding of the question is influenced by how its meaning is processed. If we hear "heavier... gold... feathers" we give an automatic response; if we hear "heavier... lead... mercury" we don't give the same automatic response, since the answer is not automatic - I'm pretty sure it's lead, but I wouldn't wager a large sum of money on it at very low odds, which I would do with gold being heavier (by volume) than feathers.