alyssavance comments on Arrow's Theorem is a Lie - Less Wrong

27 Post author: alyssavance 24 October 2009 08:46PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (62)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: alyssavance 26 October 2009 08:17:40PM 1 point [-]

By Arrow's Theorem, any process by which rankings are mapped to scores must violate one of these criteria, once the scores are processed using my algorithm. This is not terribly surprising, as you lose all the information about relative importance in doing so.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 26 October 2009 08:32:59PM 1 point [-]

Yes; but can we find a process which violates only determinism? Because we don't need determinism.

Comment author: Tyrrell_McAllister 28 October 2009 12:55:25AM 4 points [-]

but can we find a process which violates only determinism?

That's exactly what tommccabe's process does. It violates determinism in Arrow's sense of the word, but it satisfies the other conditions. Moreover, it violates Arrow-style determinism in a way that we arguably want anyway.