David_J_Balan comments on The Value of Nature and Old Books - Less Wrong

7 Post author: David_J_Balan 25 October 2009 06:14PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (64)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: David_J_Balan 26 October 2009 04:59:20AM 1 point [-]

If people just plain like nature, that alone is a good reason for there to be nature. That's true for just about anything (that doesn't harm others). The question is whether nature is deserving of some special status or protection (maybe nothing is deserving on such protection and there should be only as much of it as arises under free markets, but that's another argument). I certainly didn't mean to suggest that nature is a world completely apart and that we bring none of our baggage with us when we enter it. But I do think that I can be more relaxed and confident that my experience is genuine and that I'm not being played in the woods than I can in Disney World, that this is of special value, and that this is precisely the kind of thing that the market tends to under-provide since no profits can be made from it.

Comment author: wedrifid 26 October 2009 07:26:38AM 2 points [-]

If people just plain like nature, that alone is a good reason for there to be nature. That's true for just about anything (that doesn't harm others).

And everything that does too! (For a start because having activities with no negative externalities is virtually impossible. Both keeping and destroying nature included.)