gwern comments on Our House, My Rules - Less Wrong

36 Post author: David_J_Balan 02 November 2009 12:44AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (229)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gwern 04 November 2009 05:22:11PM 2 points [-]

So then the legal system should award status based on usefulness and intelligence, not age as in the present system.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emancipation_of_minors

"In most countries of the world, adolescents below the legal age of majority (adulthood) may be emancipated in some manner: through marriage, economic self-sufficiency, educational degree or diploma, military service, or obtaining medical conditions in a form of diseases such as AIDS, HPV, or other STDs."

Comment author: William 05 November 2009 09:50:33PM 2 points [-]

But should stupid adults have no rights?

Comment author: DanArmak 06 November 2009 01:23:19AM 9 points [-]

Fewer rights, perhaps.

More to the point, equal rights isn't a good idea because it's just and right, but rather because it's a defensive position against rulers who grant extra rights to privileged groups.

Comment author: gwern 05 November 2009 10:09:28PM 3 points [-]

/me checks into legal status of retarded adults & vegetables

Dunno about 'should', but they don't have very much beyond what kids have...

Comment author: Clarity 11 November 2015 09:49:10PM 0 points [-]

Usefulness to who? Isn't it enough for people to be useful to themselves if they're not harmful to others?