mormon2 comments on Open Thread: November 2009 - Less Wrong

3 [deleted] 02 November 2009 01:18AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (539)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: mormon2 02 November 2009 04:12:45PM 5 points [-]

What? Who voted this up?

"It is also quite possible that the Higgs boson will come out and it will be utterly useless, as most of those particles are."

So understanding the sub-atomic level for things like nano-scale technology in your books is a complete waste of time? Understanding the universe I can only assume is also a waste of time since the discovery of the Higgs Boson in your books is essentially meaningless in all probability.

"You can't do a thing with them and they don't tell you very much. Of course, the euphoria will be massive."

Huh? From someone who studies particle physics to one (you) who doesn't obviously (and I am going to be hard on you) you should refrain making such comments in nearly total ignorance. The fact that you don't understand the significance of the Higgs Boson or particle physics should have been a cue that you have noting to contribute to this thread.

Sorry but there it is...

Comment author: Thomas 02 November 2009 08:21:31PM 1 point [-]

No ato-tech in sight, no use for already discovered particles and you are telling me how valuable Higgs boson will be. Not only you but the whole CERN affiliated community and most of the media.

I remain skeptic, if you don't mind.

Comment author: soreff 03 November 2009 03:55:34AM -1 points [-]

You have a point. I have a somewhat similar view of elements above perhaps Einsteinium. I'll be more impressed with physics' control over the electroweak interaction when I see the weak nuclear force equivalent of an electromagnet :-) I wonder what is the maximum particle energy that someone has actually used in a non-elementary-particle-physics-research application? Maybe the incoming beam for a spallation neutron source, somewhere in the MeV range?

Comment author: mormon2 03 November 2009 05:26:26PM 5 points [-]

Ok, I am going to reply to both soreff and Thomas:

Particle physics isn't about making technology at least at the moment. Particle physics is concerned with understanding the fundamental elements of our world. As far as the details of the relevance of particle physics I won't waste the time to explain. Obviously neither of you have any real experience in the field. So this concludes what comments I am going to make on this topic until someone with real physics knowledge decides to comment.