I know my original post was never substantiated with any evidence based analysis for the true motivations behind anti-feminism.
You should rectify that as soon as possible.
I think their attacks on my capacity for objective reasoning are a bit hypocritical.
Hypocrisy doesn't make one wrong. An assertion that murder is wrong is not falsified by it being said by a murderer.
" An assertion that murder is wrong is not falsified by it being said by a murderer."
No, but saying that there is no point in arguing with a woman because women are not capable to discerning objective truth is an instance of making an assertion which is not based on objective truth (unless you can provide evidence that being female necessarily prevents capacity for objective reasoning in all cases and subsequently prevents the ability to arrive at objective truth).
It is like saying, "you rely on personal attacks, therefore your perspective on the environment is not correct"
This thread is for the discussion of Less Wrong topics that have not appeared in recent posts. Feel free to rid yourself of cached thoughts by doing so in Old Church Slavonic. If a discussion gets unwieldy, celebrate by turning it into a top-level post.
If you're new to Less Wrong, check out this welcome post.