yet fail to expose them as self contradicting or fallacious

A side note: these two are not the only reasons to not be persuaded by arguments, although naturally they are the easiest to point out.

You seem willing to come back and make about any random comment in an effort to have the last word and that is what I am willing to give to you.

My 'last word' was here. It is an amicable hat tip and expansion on a reasonable perspective that you provide. How much FAI thinking sounds like a "Rapture of the Nerds". It also acknowledges our difference in perspective. While we both imagine evolutionary selection pressures as a 'force', you see it as one to be embraced and defined by while I see it as one that must be mastered or else.

We're not going to come closer to agreement than that because we have a fundamentally different moral philosophy which gives us different perspectives on the whole field.