= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
RobinZ comments on Practical rationality in surveys - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (11)
A journal that reported likelihood ratios would at least be doing better.
A journal that actually cared about science would accept papers before the experiment had been done, with a fixed statistical methodology submitted with the paper in advance rather than data-mining the statistical significance afterward.
Not an objection, but a lot of the articles in that journal would be "here's my reproduction of the results I got last year and published then".
...which is a really good thing, on reflection.