wedrifid comments on Less Wrong Q&A with Eliezer Yudkowsky: Ask Your Questions - Less Wrong

16 Post author: MichaelGR 11 November 2009 03:00AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (682)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 16 November 2009 08:38:19AM 1 point [-]

As the OP said, Eliezer hasn't been subpoenaed. The questions here are merely stimulus to which he can respond with whichever insights or signals he desires to convey. For what little it is worth my 1.58 bits is 'up'.

(At least, if it is granted that a given person has read a post and that his voting decision is made actively then I think I would count it as 1.58 bits. It's a little blurry.)

Comment author: [deleted] 17 November 2009 02:11:00AM 1 point [-]

It depends on the probability distribution of comments.

Comment author: wedrifid 17 November 2009 02:38:05AM 0 points [-]

It depends on the probability distribution of comments.

Good point. Probability distribution of comments relative to those doing the evaluation.