wedrifid comments on Efficient prestige hypothesis - Less Wrong

18 Post author: taw 16 November 2009 10:25PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (35)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: RobinHanson 17 November 2009 01:10:53AM 12 points [-]

Consider the analogous hypotheses about attractive real estate brokers, which are in higher demand. You might claim that broker attractiveness is just an indicator of broker quality. One hypothesis says attractive brokers are in more demand mostly because they sell houses faster, while another hypothesis says the are in more demand mostly because people like to hang out with attractive people. We could compare these theories empirically by seeing if in fact attractive brokers sell houses faster or for more money. If they don't, or if their gains aren't enough to cover their added costs, the second hypothesis would be favored.

Comment author: wedrifid 17 November 2009 05:00:23AM 0 points [-]

Good test. Has someone done it?

Comment author: CannibalSmith 17 November 2009 08:28:13AM 0 points [-]

Good test. Does anyone here has a house to sell?

Comment author: wedrifid 17 November 2009 08:40:05AM 2 points [-]

Good test. Does anyone have a bunch of grad students to go and rate real estate brokers and compare with existing sales data?