= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Wei_Dai comments on Agree, Retort, or Ignore? A Post From the Future - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (84)
This is childish. You propose a norm, it doesn't make much of a splash, and so you adopt an incredulous persona to try to make us invoke an absurdity heuristic on our lack of norm-having? I liked the original idea - it'd be interesting, at least - but this is silly.
It was meant to be a light-hearted attempt to fight the Status Quo Institution Bias. Since you liked the original idea but don't like the way I went about trying to get it implemented, do you have any other suggestions?
You could have just started using it yourself and upvoted anyone who copied you. Or tried to draw out specific participants in specific threads - "I think an endcap to this conversation from you would add a lot of value, if you could just summarize..."
I did try to do it myself, for example here, here, here and here. But nobody seems to have noticed or imitated me, or if they did, I didn't notice them.
Trying to practice this to a greater extent, without an established group norm, would have signaled things I prefer not to signal, I think.