jimrandomh comments on Agree, Retort, or Ignore? A Post From the Future - Less Wrong

35 Post author: Wei_Dai 24 November 2009 10:29PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (84)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: jimrandomh 25 November 2009 01:46:40AM 8 points [-]

If posting on a blog required committing to spend time in the future answering replies, then I wouldn't post there. I treat blogging as a leisure activity, which means that I should be able to stop doing it at any time and for any duration without consequences. I think most non-prominent posters feel the same way.

Comment author: RobinZ 25 November 2009 02:56:54AM 9 points [-]

I'm actually divided about this. On the one hand, it's a really good point - this isn't something which should be a commitment. On the other hand, it makes sense as a norm - it's worth a lot to see an argument end in a satisfactory fashion, even if that fashion is, "I don't see any value in continuing this debate".

On the gripping hand, though, people will drop out of arguments without conclusion - through burning out, getting slammed with other commitments, or even through the simple decision that the community is not worth their time. And all these are legitimate reasons, even if "I can't win this argument otherwise" is not.

"Encourage it" is about where I'm at, now.

Comment author: Wei_Dai 25 November 2009 06:53:05AM 0 points [-]

Your request seems reasonable, and I think it can accommodated without too much difficulty. For example, each user can set a "vacation" option, which if turned on, will cause every unanswered comment directed at that user to receive a "I'm away from this blog" status response.

Comment author: wedrifid 25 November 2009 07:17:45AM 3 points [-]

I do not like autoresponders.

Something that could be done unintrusively and without manual intervention from users is some indicator that the author has not logged in recently. eg. A change in color somewhere, an asterix, etc.

Comment author: AdeleneDawner 25 November 2009 09:55:30AM 1 point [-]

I like this idea, whether or not any other suggestions are put into practice, though I suggest that there be a way to opt out of using it (with a different/complementary signal that you're doing so, rather than showing as always or never active) - there are periods when I only have the time or energy to skim the blog, but not comment, and I'm sure I'm not the only one who finds themselves in that position or simply prefers privacy.

Comment author: wedrifid 25 November 2009 12:15:04PM 1 point [-]

I agree. You shouldn't be expected to manually delete your cookies in order to manipulate activity indicators.

Comment author: Vladimir_Golovin 25 November 2009 08:48:21AM *  2 points [-]

I feel that something like bug tracking / trouble ticket software format could be appropriate for this purpose -- unresolved arguments would be marked as such, people could view unresolved "arguments" assigned to them, and it would be easy to judge the level of commitment of participants by their number of unresolved arguments.

Obviously, participating in such a system would require much higher level of commitment than that of the current blog format.