= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
AndrewKemendo comments on A Nightmare for Eliezer - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (74)
So is this an AGI or not? If it is then it's smarter than Mr. Yudkowski and can resolve it's own problems.
Intelligence isn't a magical single-dimensional quality. It may be generally smarter than EY, but not have the specific FAI theory that EY has developed.
Any AGI will have all dimensions which are required to make a human level or greater intelligence. If it is indeed smarter, then it will be able to figure the theory out itself if the theory is obviously correct, or find a way to get it in a more efficient manner.
Well, maybe the theory is inobviously correct.
The AI called EY because it's stuck while trying to grow, so it hasn't achieved its full potential yet. It should be able to comprehend any theory a human EY can comprehend; but I don't see why we should expect it to be able to independently derive any theory a human could ever derive in their lifetimes, in (small) finite time, and without all the data available to that human.
Yay multidimensional theories of intelligence!
Its a seed AGI in the process of growing. Whether "Smarter than Yudkowski" => "Can resolve own problems" is still an open problem 8-).
I find this the most humorous bit in the post. Smarter than Yudokowsky? May be.