timtyler comments on Contrarianism and reference class forecasting - Less Wrong

26 Post author: taw 25 November 2009 07:41PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (90)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: SilasBarta 26 November 2009 04:45:23AM 2 points [-]

What absence of smaller disasters? Why don't the brushes with nuclear war and other things you mention count?

Also, civilizations have fallen. Not in the sense of their genes dying out [1] but in the sense of losing the technological level they previously had. The end of the Islamic Golden Age, China after the 15th century, the fall of Rome (I remember reading one statistic that said that the glass production peak during the Roman empire wasn't surpassed until the 19th century, and it wasn't from lack of demand.)

[1] unless you count the Neanderthals, which were probably more intelligent than h. sapiens. And all the other species in genus homo.

Comment author: timtyler 26 November 2009 09:54:08AM -1 points [-]

This is still civilisation's very first attempt, really. I did acknowledge the existence of wars and pandemics. However, disasters that never happened (such as nuclear war) are challenging to accurately assess the probability of.