LauraABJ comments on Morality and International Humanitarian Law - Less Wrong

2 Post author: David_J_Balan 30 November 2009 03:27AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (100)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 30 November 2009 12:41:43PM 0 points [-]

history consists of "wars to end all wars", "wars to punish aggressors" and alikes, not a single of them actually worked at stopping future wars. On the other hand just giving in, like many did to Romans, or Mongols, not too infrequently led to centuries of peace.

How do "wars to stop the invaders looting your stuff, killing most of your menfolk, raping your women and eating your lifestock" fit in here?

You have a strange idea of 'just' if it doesn't include a nation defending itself from attack (war) ever.

Comment author: LauraABJ 30 November 2009 03:29:38PM 2 points [-]

Also, if the aggressor is killing all of your population, then it will be their genetic descendants enjoying those centuries of peace, and not yours.