rwallace comments on Open Thread: December 2009 - Less Wrong

3 Post author: CannibalSmith 01 December 2009 04:25PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (263)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: rwallace 01 December 2009 10:36:53PM *  0 points [-]

Stanford's team did.

Ah, I had assumed they must have been working on the problem before the first one, but their webpage confirms your statement here. I stand corrected!

Neither is mine.

Good, that will help.

I do not believe I can learn much from existing RTS AIs because their goal is entertaining the player instead of winning. In fact, I've never met an AI that I can't beat after a few days of practice. They're all the same: build a base and repeatedly throw groups of units at the enemy's defensive line until run out of resources, mindlessly following the same predictable route each time.

Yeah. Personally I never found that very entertaining :-) If you can write one that does better, maybe the industry might sit up and take notice. Best of luck with the project, and let us know how it turns out.

Comment author: SilasBarta 01 December 2009 11:38:28PM 2 points [-]

Please fix this post's formatting. I beg you.

Comment author: rwallace 01 December 2009 11:50:46PM 0 points [-]

What's the recommended way to format quoted fragments on this site to distinguish them from one's own text? I tried copy pasting CannibalSmith's comment, but that copied as indentation with four spaces, which when I used it, gave a different result.

Comment author: Jayson_Virissimo 01 December 2009 11:55:36PM 2 points [-]

Click on the reply button and then click the help link in the bottom right corner. It explains how to properly format your comments.

Comment author: rwallace 02 December 2009 08:39:41AM 0 points [-]

Okay, thanks, fixed.