Criticism would be good from people who know you better. What you write online is probably a bad indication of your rationality. We don't know what you behavior looks like in your daily life. I know I'm vastly more irrational than what I write here would lead people to believe. To the extent that reading what you wrote could tell us something important about you, it is fairly likely it would have come up already. And the time you have spent on this thread could probably have been used doing something more likely to help your rationality.
Bizarrely, the best way to prove me wrong would be to accept this criticism as extremely helpful.
Last time, I wrote about 11 core rationalist skills. Now I would like some help from the LW community: which of these skills am I good at, which ones am I bad at? Just to recap, the skills are:
I'll post a description of each one of these skills as a comment, and if you think I am good at that skill, vote it up. If you think I am bad at it, vote it down. Don't be too shy - even if you are biased or uncertain - because over the course of many votes, these biases and errors will cancel out to some extent. (This is the "guess the number of beans in a jar by asking 50 people to guess and taking the average" method)
EDIT: We can also comment on each rationalist skill to say how well I am doing at that skill. Later today, I will do this myself.
Thanks in advance!