= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Steve_Rayhawk comments on Parapsychology: the control group for science - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (184)
Interesting point. Since physics does appear on the surface to be continuous, I can't rule out continuous propositions. Perhaps the amended saying should read "0 and 1 are not probability masses, and 0 is not a probability density."
Oh. I was expecting your belief to be as with infinite-set atheism: that we never actually see an infinitely precise measurement.
We don't, but what if there are infinitely precise truths nonetheless? The math of Bayesianism would require assigning them probabilities.