matt comments on Parapsychology: the control group for science - Less Wrong

62 Post author: AllanCrossman 05 December 2009 10:50PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (184)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Jack 07 December 2009 09:30:18PM *  2 points [-]

When I was first introduced to quantum mechanics my professor taught us the Copenhagen Interpretation. I was immediately reminded of occasional moments in video games where features of a room aren't run until the player gets to the room. It seemed to me that only collapsing the wave function when it interacted with a particular kind of physical system (or a conscious system!) would be a really good way to conserve computing power and that it seemed like the kind of hack programmers in an fully Newtonian universe might use to approximate their universe without having to calculate the trajectories of a googolplex (ed) subatomic particles.

Can anyone tell me if this actually would save computing power/memory?

Comment author: matt 07 December 2009 10:53:46PM 2 points [-]

googleplex = Google Inc's HQ

googolplex = 10^(10^100)

Comment author: Blueberry 08 December 2009 12:16:43AM -2 points [-]

It's truly sad now how people are less familiar with the original spelling and meaning of a googol. Now the first thing we think of is the search engine, instead of 10^100.

Comment author: gwern 08 December 2009 06:52:19PM 5 points [-]

Is that really so sad? googol was named in jest and I do not think I have ever seen it seriously needed for anything; Google on the other hand...