wedrifid comments on Science - Idealistic Versus Signaling - Less Wrong

8 Post author: billswift 06 December 2009 01:39PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (57)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 07 December 2009 01:35:09AM 3 points [-]

So, cracking the atom is a fundamental breakthrough, because we simply couldn't do that before. No matter how much money you spent, you could only exploit natural atom-cracking in radioactive decay - you could not vary the rate. So that was a fundamental breakthrough. Going from A-bomb to H-bomb, not so much (we could always just use a couple A-bombs where we could now use an H-bomb).

H bombs would seem to be a different fundamental breakthrough than atom splitting. The similarity is their engineering application more than their fundamentals.

Comment author: CronoDAS 08 December 2009 09:50:24PM 1 point [-]

Atom combining, as opposed to atom splitting?

Comment author: gwern 03 January 2010 08:28:34PM 0 points [-]

Hm; you're right that that is a bad example - H-bombs are man-caused fusion, not fission.

Although, I'm not sure we couldn't fuse before the first H-bomb: sonoluminescence, which might be caused by bubble fusion, was first produced in 1934.