JoshuaZ comments on You Be the Jury: Survey on a Current Event - Less Wrong

31 Post author: komponisto 09 December 2009 04:25AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (260)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 01 January 2011 06:09:05PM 3 points [-]

I would say there is 0 chance of Knox or Sollecito being involved in the murder at all.

Assigning probability zero to something is not in general a good idea.

Comment author: MerleRideout 04 January 2011 06:31:05AM -2 points [-]

Why? What negative result follows when you assign probability zero to something? I haven't consciously experienced any so far.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 04 January 2011 02:21:48PM 3 points [-]

It might help to read the linked essay in my previous comment. When one assigns probability 0 or 1 to something, one cannot update based on evidence. That is, if one really believes that, there should be no amount of evidence that will convince you. That's problematic if one is trying to be a rationalist. And if there is some amount of evidence that can convince you then you don't really assign probability 0 or 1 to the claim.