I have implicitly suggested solutions in my post. Perhaps you want to reread it.

I'm not comfortable with there being no stated guidelines for post submissions, nor that the lack of such guidelines allow Eliezer to invent the rules on-the-go only when it serves him to do so.

I'm also not comfortable with their not being an available list of moderators/editors, as I fear that Eliezer may be the only one.

On a related note, being inconsistent is better than becoming consistently wrong (here, X=inconsistency).

But it is worse than being consistently right. Perhaps I'm failing to see your point here.

Taken in isolation, the feature of an answer to mormon2's question being of interest to some readers is good, but quality of presentation kills this benefit in the picture as a whole. Besides, the outline of the answer is pretty obvious, and was explained at length, so the cosmic significance of asking this question is also dubious.

I don't care about mormon2's post, nor the questions raised in it. I think the answers which were provided are probably not accurate, but don't really care. I've stated elsewhere my motivation for submitting this post, and its relation to mormon2's post is only nominal (in that the comments Eliezer made to me occurred in its comment thread, but could have occurred elsewhere).