Technologos comments on Fundamentally Flawed, or Fast and Frugal? - Less Wrong

41 Post author: Kaj_Sotala 20 December 2009 03:10PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (74)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 21 December 2009 07:57:03PM 1 point [-]

No luck. You should write everything in math, specifying types (domains/codomains) of all functions/random variables. It'll really be easier, and the confusion (mine or yours) will be instantly resolved.

Comment author: Technologos 21 December 2009 08:31:03PM 0 points [-]

Ah, I think I found it. I took V to have a codomain in utilons in your example (that was my interpretation of "V is a random variable that depends only on u").

Reinterpreting the subsequent comments in that context, I can see that I was responding to "formally equivalent" in the original comment as if it meant "expected utility maximization of the traditional sort, where each outcome x is itself assigned a value by a function on x that does not involve V, will produce the same decisions as satisficing of the type described under these conditions."

Interestingly, the latter may be true if V did have a codomain in utilons (or at least, I was unable to come up with a consistent counterexample).