= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Jonathan_Graehl comments on The Correct Contrarian Cluster - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (228)
They don't have to think it's a slam-dunk. They just have to choose "Yes" if the choices are "Yes" or "No".
In effect, you're encouraging rationalist posers to signal agreement with you on these signature issues. By talking about the signal and its interpretation, you weaken it.
You obviously don't poll Less Wrong readers using those keys!
Does that mean you're holding some in reserve?