Jayson_Virissimo comments on The Correct Contrarian Cluster - Less Wrong

38 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 21 December 2009 10:01PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (228)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Pablo_Stafforini 21 September 2014 10:10:01PM *  1 point [-]

I think the method that was taught in my family is better: become an expert on one or more subjects, so that you can know, by evaluating the evidence, which views are correct. Then, judge sources by their accuracy in those areas on which you are expert.

Bertrand Russell used this method successfully to assess the value of Hegel's philosophy:

When I was young, most teachers of philosophy in British and American universities were Hegelians, so that, until I read Hegel, I supposed there must be some truth to his system; I was cured, however, by discovering that everything he said on the philosophy of mathematics was plain nonsense.

Unpopular essays, chap. 1

Comment author: Jayson_Virissimo 26 September 2014 10:31:31PM *  3 points [-]

Upon further inspection, I've concluded something is seriously wrong here (especially if Russell had much of an impact in shaping later philosophers' view of Hegel). In Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, Russell claims Hegel's knowledge of mathematics is out of date and that he believed calculus requires infinitesimals. This is totally wrong. The longest (or one of the longest) sections in his Science of Logic is an attempt at refuting the validity of infinitesimals (while still affirming the validity of the differential and integral calculus).

Will investigate further when I have the time.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 28 December 2014 01:19:20AM 1 point [-]

This is not the only example of this sort of thing. Russell has a lot of examples like this where he clearly didn't read the original sources and it suffers from this. There are similar issues where he bashes Aristotle for a lack of empiricism.

Comment author: Pablo_Stafforini 28 December 2014 12:56:06AM 1 point [-]

Did you manage to research this issue further? I'm curious.