= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
DanArmak comments on On the Power of Intelligence and Rationality - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (187)
No, rationality == winning by definition. Intelligence doesn't seem to be well defined.
Rationality = having accurate beliefs about the world, not winning. If Eliezer Yudkowsky were serving a life sentence in a prison in Pakistan, he would be much more rational than the average person, but much less capable of winning.
Eh, I'd just convince them to let me out.
Hahahaha... How long have you been saving that one?
I suspect that it's easier to talk your way out of an AI-box than a prison cell.
Perhaps, but I'm a bit stunned at the idea that being in a prison cell means you should just give up. Have I taught you all nothing?
Well, come on, the first ideas I thought of wouldn't work in that situation. What do you expect me to do, think about it for five minutes?
The full phrase is "think about it for five minutes by an actual physical clock".
Good point.
Or, if you like, you can take it from Amanda.
Rationality == winning, but you still have to work with what you're given, obviously. Given that you're serving a life sentence in a Pakistani prison, (perfect) rationality will let you make the best of it.