DanArmak comments on On the Power of Intelligence and Rationality - Less Wrong

13 Post author: alyssavance 23 December 2009 10:49AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (187)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DanArmak 27 December 2009 02:06:34PM *  1 point [-]

I was talking about anecdotal average Americans. That is to say, they may or may not be highly representative, but they're the one we hear anecdotes about. In other words, I didn't mean to impugn Americans as a group, and intended to refer only jokingly to the idea of classing all Americans as a single group with a meaningful (low variance) typical knowledge of history.

and to the the factual assumption that school curriculum translates into knowledge of adults

I do believe that a large majority of people everywhere never learn any more about most historical subjects than what they are taught in mandatory classes in school. And so they don't revise or correct the school curriculum's claims. If you disagree, can you give examples of historical claims made in school that average adults disbelieve? Particularly descriptions of historical events that happened outside their own country?

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 27 December 2009 02:26:24PM 1 point [-]

If you disagree, can you give examples of historical claims made in school that average adults disbelieve?

Not disbelieve, just don't remember, aren't aware of anymore, 10 or 30 years later.

Comment author: DanArmak 27 December 2009 02:50:20PM 0 points [-]

Certainly, some things are forgotten, but I expect other things are remembered, particularly when people encounter direct questions about the subject. And those that are remembered, are typically there from school.