= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Kaj_Sotala comments on A Master-Slave Model of Human Preferences - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (80)
I'd upvote this comment twice if I could.
p(wedrifid would upvote a comment twice | he upvoted it once) > 0.95
Would other people have a different approach?
I'd use some loose scale where the quality of the comment correlated with the amount of upvotes it got. Assuming that a user could give up to two upvotes per comment, then a funny one-liner or a moderately interesting comment would get one vote, truly insightful ones two.
p(Kaj would upvote a comment twice | he upvoted it once) would probably be somewhere around [.3, .6]
That's the scale I use. Unfortunately, my ability to (directly) influence how many upvotes it gets is limited to a plus or minus one shift.