Less Wrong is a community blog devoted to refining the art of human rationality. Please visit our About page for more information.

Jack comments on Max Tegmark on our place in history: "We're Not Insignificant After All" - Less Wrong

18 [deleted] 04 January 2010 12:02AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (68)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: MatthewB 04 January 2010 04:37:53PM 0 points [-]

Or if they entered a region of dust or gas that had a temperature differential to the sphere.

If fact, I just realized that if any such structures like Ringworlds existed, they would be trivially easy to spot if they were at the right aspect to us. It would look like a star with either a band across it, or like the star had a single ring. The ring on the far side of the star would also be tremendously bright (if angled to our solar system slightly) and much easier to spot with a telescope that blocked off the light of the central star.

Just an OT thought.

Comment author: Jack 04 January 2010 06:00:54PM 0 points [-]

Stars are too bright and too far away and the ringworld too thin (at least I think there would be stability problems if they were built too wide, but I don't know enough). Worse, I thought the way we were trying to detect planets these days was by looking at the gravitational effect the planet has on the star. But wouldn't a ringworld balance out its own gravitation effect on the star?

Comment author: MatthewB 04 January 2010 08:47:04PM *  0 points [-]

The Kepler Observatory also detects planets by masking the light from the star and then looking for any bright spots (Coronal Masking).

Even more advanced telescopes will use this technique in combination with the gravity wobble. There are also diffraction and coronal masking.

http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/0004-637X/662/1/738/65461.web.pdf

http://spie.org/x24241.xml?ArticleID=x24241

why did I get down voted on that post?