Larks comments on Disclosure vs. Bans: Reply to Robin Hanson - Less Wrong

6 Post author: David_J_Balan 04 January 2010 01:09AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (56)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 04 January 2010 06:20:29AM *  4 points [-]

Nonetheless, if large numbers of people were unwilling to pay that price/accept those terms, competitors would enter the market to cater for them.

And yet, in reality, this doesn't always happen. For years, people complained about restaurants being full of cigarette smoke; and some people had to stay home and not go out because they could not tolerate cigarette smoke. AFAIK, no one ever, anywhere in the US, voluntarily opened a restaurant that did not allow smoking. I may be wrong; but I would have remembered if any restaurant I had ever encountered had ever advertised the fact that they were a non-smoking restaurant, so that I could have gone there.

Comment author: Larks 05 January 2010 11:15:43AM 0 points [-]

I can't speak for the US, but I think there were some in the UK. I didn't really go to restaurants before the ban (and still can't afford to much) but I never remember there being much smoke around; maybe they found other ways around the problem, like better ventilation.

Even if not, it may simply be that smokers care about wanting to smoke a lot more than non-smokers care about not wanting to inhale smoke.