thomblake comments on A Suite of Pragmatic Considerations in Favor of Niceness - Less Wrong

82 Post author: Alicorn 05 January 2010 09:32PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (183)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Furcas 06 January 2010 12:31:44AM *  5 points [-]

Alicorn was recommending niceness as a less wrong norm.

I thought she was recommending niceness to LWers and people from "communities similar to ours" no matter where we are.

We all know you're not one of those people and we won't refrain from criticizing your for fear of sounding like a jerk.

My own spotless reputation aside, I've noticed that discussion forums where everyone tries to be "nice" tend to degenerate into places where all criticism has to be phrased meekly and thus forthright criticism becomes impossible.

Sometimes, a spade has to be called a spade, and a moron has to be called a moron.

Comment author: thomblake 06 January 2010 02:35:27PM 7 points [-]

a spade has to be called a spade, and a moron has to be called a moron

These rules are not of a kind. In the former case, you have something that's indisputably a (shovel|playing card suit) and call it by its name. In the latter case, you likely don't have very solid grounds for identifying a person as a 'moron' (we're talking about Internet exchanges, right?) and the term isn't very well-defined in the first place.

If you're administering early 20th-century IQ tests then you have good reason to be calling people morons; otherwise, no.