MatthewB comments on Rationality Quotes January 2010 - Less Wrong

3 Post author: Zack_M_Davis 07 January 2010 09:36AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (140)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: MatthewB 07 January 2010 03:59:59PM 2 points [-]

Armstrong's reply was not up when I first read the article. I am glad you brought that to my attention.

I am stunned at her reply. She completely missed the point that Harris was making (not surprising, I have known some pretty smart people who were caught flat-footed by the philosophical tool of object replacement). That she did not catch the comparison of witchcraft in Africa as a form of religious practice is... well, stunning.

Yes, Karen, what we need to do with Theologists such as William Lane Craig, who whole-heartedly defends the genocidal acts of his God in the old testament, is to have their theology enriched by rationalizing of those atrocities rather than have them understand why they do not stand up to a rational criticism.

Comment author: Blueberry 09 January 2010 09:43:09AM 0 points [-]

I have known some pretty smart people who were caught flat-footed by the philosophical tool of object replacement

Can you elaborate? What is the tool of "object replacement"?

Comment author: MatthewB 09 January 2010 10:51:01AM 2 points [-]

It is essentially what Harris did in the article. He replaced the noun objects of Armstrong's point with other, analogous/isomorphic objects to illustrate that the point being made did not have the merit that Armstrong thought it did.

I'll see about looking up the term as it applies to Propositional Logic. It's a more widely recognized term (at least here).