Kevin comments on The Wannabe Rational - Less Wrong

31 Post author: MrHen 15 January 2010 08:09PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (296)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Kevin 16 January 2010 03:46:53AM *  3 points [-]

I don't think that specific conversation was being referred to, but the general pattern of Eliezer's willingness to ban people that are consistently downmodded in conversations.

My broader point was that by using the appropriate language to admit wrongness and irrationality and uncertainty, it should be permissible to be almost arbitrarily irrational here, at least until someone tells you to go read the sequences before commenting again.

Comment author: wedrifid 16 January 2010 01:31:24PM *  4 points [-]

I don't think that specific conversation was being referred to, but the general pattern of Eliezer's willingness to ban people that are consistently downmodded in conversations.

What I have always found weird was him actually threatening to delete all future comments from an account rather than actually banning the account. Freedom with message deletion actually makes me more nervous than a free hand with the /kick command. It seems more transparent.

My broader point was that by using the appropriate language to admit wrongness and irrationality and uncertainty, it should be permissible to be almost arbitrarily irrational here, at least until someone tells you to go read the sequences before commenting again.

Humility and basic courtesy do go a long way, don't they?

Comment author: Kevin 17 January 2010 12:25:46AM 4 points [-]

I think it was the meta thread where I commented that Less Wrong needs a Hacker News style dead/showdead system, which allows you to arbitrarily censor while simultaneously allaying concerns about censorship.

Humility and basic courtesy do go a long way, don't they?

Amen.