AdeleneDawner comments on Fictional Evidence vs. Fictional Insight - Less Wrong

31 Post author: Wei_Dai 08 January 2010 01:59AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (43)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: AdeleneDawner 08 January 2010 06:23:09AM *  1 point [-]

If the fiction rings true, the reader will empathize with the characters and learn from their experiences what the characters themselves learned.

I think that depends mostly on individual reading style, actually. I tend to ignore emotional situations unless they're extremely obvious, because I find them hard to follow (which is probably because I haven't spent much energy on learning to follow them... no, I don't know which came first), which leads to not having much investment in characters compared to how most people seem to react. I find it much easier to gather insights about things like how groups might be organized, or how problems might be solved, and I do pick up the type of insight mentioned in the original post, too.

Comment author: Technologos 08 January 2010 05:29:06PM 1 point [-]

Agreed. Part of the reason I love reading Asimov is that he focuses so much on the ideas he's presenting, without much attempt to invest the reader emotionally in the characters. I find the latter impairs my ability to synthesize useful general truths from fiction (especially short stories, my favorite form of Asimov).