gwern comments on Reference class of the unclassreferenceable - Less Wrong

25 Post author: taw 08 January 2010 04:13AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (150)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gwern 11 January 2010 04:43:11AM *  3 points [-]

Perhaps. But I am far more annoyed by people who know better throwing around absolute terms, when they also know counterexamples are available in literally 3 or 4 seconds - if they would stop being lazy and would just look.

(I'm seriously considering registering an account 'LetMeFuckingGoogleThatForYou' to handle these sorts of replies; LW may be big enough now that such role-accounts are needed.)

Comment author: DonGeddis 12 January 2010 12:13:56AM *  2 points [-]

Already done: JustFuckingGoogleIt

Comment author: pdf23ds 11 January 2010 04:57:45AM *  2 points [-]

The absolute terms were appropriate, referring as they did only to my personal experience. It was only intended as a weak, throwaway comment. I suppose you might be annoyed that I think such anecdotes are worthy of mention.

Edited to add: If you'd quoted instead "Seems to who?" I wouldn't have found your comment at all objectionable.

Comment author: Zack_M_Davis 11 January 2010 05:17:57AM 2 points [-]

(I'm seriously considering registering an account 'LetMeFuckingGoogleThatForYou' to handle these sorts of replies; LW may be big enough now that such role-accounts are needed.)

Sockpuppetry considered harmful.

Comment author: gwern 11 January 2010 02:01:47PM 1 point [-]
Comment author: Emile 24 October 2010 06:20:37PM 0 points [-]

You can link to searches with Let Me Google That for You