ChristianKl comments on Savulescu: "Genetically enhance humanity or face extinction" - Less Wrong

4 [deleted] 10 January 2010 12:26AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (193)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DanArmak 10 January 2010 10:58:13PM 3 points [-]

I don't think most people living in other times & places privately agreed with their society's public morality, to the same extent that we do today.

For most of history (not prehistory), there was no option for public debate or even for openly stating opinions. Morality was normally handed down from above, from the rulers, as part of a religion. If those people had an opportunity to live in our society and be acclimatized to it, many of them may have preferred our morality. I don't believe the reverse is true, however.

This doesn't prove that our morality is objectively better - it's impossible to prove this, by definition - but it does dismiss the implication of the argument that "you like today's morality because you live today". Only the people who live today are likely to like their time's morality.

Comment author: ChristianKl 13 January 2010 03:29:54PM 1 point [-]

In the middle ages in Europe the middle class lived after much stricter morality than the ruling class when it comes to question such as having sex.

Morality was often the way of the powerless to feel like they are better than the ruling class.