PhilGoetz comments on Dennett's "Consciousness Explained": Prelude - Less Wrong

12 Post author: PhilGoetz 10 January 2010 07:31AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (97)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 10 January 2010 08:59:44PM 0 points [-]

"being conscious" is not a legit property of things.

What does that mean?

Comment author: DanArmak 10 January 2010 09:38:31PM 0 points [-]

I meant that perhaps consciousness cannot be consistently and meaningfully defined as a property of things, so as to enable us to say: a man is conscious, a rock is not.

What is consciousness, anyway? It comes to something when we need a whole book (Consciousness Explained) to tell us what a word means, instead of a simple definition. And even then we don't agree. I certainly sympathize with those who'd prefer to abolish the whole idea of consciousness, instead.