bgrah449 comments on Normal Cryonics - Less Wrong

58 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 19 January 2010 07:08PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (930)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gwern 20 January 2010 01:44:21AM 9 points [-]

Did your calculations for X take into account discounting at 0-10%? Money for research years from now does much less good than money now.

Comment author: bgrah449 20 January 2010 01:45:31AM 0 points [-]

Or the cost of the research being delayed.

Comment author: gwern 20 January 2010 01:48:37AM 0 points [-]

I figured that was covered by 'much less good'; there are a lot of costs to delaying, if we wanted to enumerate them - risks of good charities going under, inflation and catastrophic economic events gnawing away at one's stored value, the ever-present existential risks each year, etc.