Kevin comments on The things we know that we know ain't so - Less Wrong

16 Post author: PhilGoetz 11 January 2010 09:59PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (148)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Kevin 12 January 2010 11:15:53AM *  0 points [-]

I think mass video advertising would probably work. A 30 second summary of the most recent IPCC report.

If anyone reading this has $5 million, we can convince the US public that global warming will not destroy the world. Maybe we can even hint at some more realistic existential threats.

Comment author: alexflint 12 January 2010 12:42:48PM *  4 points [-]

Please define "destroy the world". It could mean:

  • rip the earth into chunks and disperse them separately through space

  • eliminate all life on earth

  • eliminate all humans on earth

  • ruin the fabric of our current civilization

Some of these are more plausible than others w.r.t. climate change

Comment author: Kevin 12 January 2010 01:04:01PM 0 points [-]

Destroy the world means somewhere between #3 and #4 depending on the person with the mistaken belief.